IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
February 1, 2006
SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF
MARIA CHRISTINI, PARENT OF A.H., DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge
AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2006, upon consideration of defendant's supplemental trial brief (Doc. 53), filed on January 31, 2006 and containing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the prior order of court (Doc. 46) directing defendant to file a trial brief and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on or before January 13, 2006,*fn1 and it appearing that defendant did not request an enlargement of time to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, see FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b)(2) ("[When] an act is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, the court for cause shown may . . . upon motion made after the expiration of the specified period permit the act to be done where the failure to act was the result of excusable neglect . . . ."); see also In re Cendant Corp. Prides Litig., 233 F.3d 188, 196 (3d Cir. 2000) (discussing factors to assess in determining excusable neglect), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. On or before February 7, 2006, defendant shall file a response showing cause why the supplemental trial brief (Doc. 53) should not be stricken from the record as untimely. See FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b)(2).
2. Failure to file a response showing cause on or before February 7, 2006 will result in the supplemental trial brief (Doc. 53) being stricken from the record.