Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Pope

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 23, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
SAVALAS J. POPE

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the order of court dated December 1, 2005 (Doc. 38), directing defendant to file a response on or before December 30, 2005, showing cause why his motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 37), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, should not be denied for failure to file within the applicable period of limitations, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section."); see also United States v. Bendolph, 409 F.3d 155, 164 (3d Cir. 2005) (providing that the court may raise § 2255 limitation period sua sponte), and it appearing that as of the date of this order defendant has not filed a response, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 37) is DENIED for failure to file within the applicable limitations period. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; United States v. Bendolph, 409 F.3d 155, 164 (3d Cir. 2005).

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

20060123

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.