Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Thomas v. Norris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 19, 2006

ELMER LEE THOMAS, PLAINTIFF
v.
GERALD NORRIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Edwin M. Kosik United States District Judge

ORDER

Before the court is an objection to an Order of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 3, 2006 denying plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to oppose defendants' motion to file for summary judgment nunc pro tunc or for an extension of time to respond to the defendants' summary judgment motion until defendants address his request regarding their job duties. Specifically, plaintiff believes that the Magistrate Judge should not have granted defendants' request to file for summary judgment out of time. We have reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Order and we do not find that it was clearly erroneous or contrary to law, 28 U.S.C. §636. Accordingly, we will dismiss the plaintiff's objection.

NOW, THEREFORE, this 19th day of January, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The plaintiff's objection to the January 3, 2006 Order of the Magistrate Judge (Document 50) is DISMISSED; and,

(2) The Magistrate Judge's January 3, 2006 Order will stand.

20060119

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.