Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Smith

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 17, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
TRINA SMITH

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Conner

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2006, the order of court dated December 7, 2005 (Doc. 63), directing defendant to file a response by January 6, 2006 setting forth the reasons for her belated filing of the notice of appeal, see FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4) ("Upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may . . . extend the time to file a notice of appeal . . . ."); see also In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 401 F.3d 143, 153-54 (3d Cir. 2005) (discussing the factors to be weighed in determining excusable neglect); United States v. Scheiner, 873 F. Supp. 927, 932 (E.D. Pa. 1995) (same), and it appearing that a response has not been filed as of the date of this order, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant shall file, on or before February 6, 2006, a response setting forth the reasons for her belated filing of the notice of appeal.

2. Failure to file such a response shall result in the court finding no excusable neglect for her belated filing of the notice of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(4).

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER United States District Judge

20060117

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.