Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Werling v. Eggleton

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA


January 17, 2006

DEVEN WERLING, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MARK EGGLETON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Arthur J. Schwab United States District Judge

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Order of Court

Pending before this Court is plaintiff's motion to compel discovery from the City of Pittsburgh (doc. no. 21) and defendant's motion for protective order (doc. no. 23). Plaintiff's motion to compel will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and defendant's motion for protective order will be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

As to plaintiff's motion to compel interrogatory number ten (10), defendant is required to answer said interrogatory and corresponding request for production of documents on or before noon on January 23, 2006. As to plaintiff's motion to compel interrogatory number six (6), defendant is required to answer said interrogatory and corresponding request for production of documents on or before noon on January 23, 2006, but said response shall be limited to ONLY the individual defendants, Mark Eggleton and Brian Roberts.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion to compel (doc. no. 21) is GRANTED as to interrogatory number 10, and GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as to interrogatory number 6, and defendant's motion for protective order (doc. no. 23) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as to interrogatory number 6, and DENIED as to interrogatory number 10.

SO ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2006.

20060117

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.