Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


December 6, 2005.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Defendant. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. CHARLES L. DESMONE & ASSOCIATES tdba DESMONE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, Third-Party Defendants. CHARLES L. DESMONE & ASSOCIATES tdba DESMONE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. MAZZA ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOY CONTI, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2005, after the plaintiff, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) was filed by defendant, City of Pittsburgh, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon consideration of the objections filed by defendant, and the response to those objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Relief Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) [Docket No. 77] is DENIED.

20051206

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.