United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
December 6, 2005.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff,
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Defendant. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. CHARLES L. DESMONE & ASSOCIATES tdba DESMONE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, Third-Party Defendants. CHARLES L. DESMONE & ASSOCIATES tdba DESMONE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. MAZZA ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOY CONTI, District Judge
AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2005, after the plaintiff,
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, filed an action in the
above-captioned case, and after a Motion for Relief Pursuant to
Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) was filed by defendant, City of Pittsburgh,
and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United
States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being
served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and upon
consideration of the objections filed by defendant, and the
response to those objections filed by plaintiff, and upon
independent review of the motion and the record, and upon
consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,
IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Relief Pursuant to
Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) [Docket No. 77] is DENIED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.