Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HOWARTH v. LAZER & BENDER

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


November 21, 2005.

LESLIE PAUL HOWARTH, Plaintiff,
v.
LAZER & BENDER, DMD, P.C., Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 28, 2005, docket no. 12, recommending that the defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 10, be granted.

  The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

  After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2005, it is

  ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 10, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

20051121

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.