Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ROBINSON v. DOE

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


November 17, 2005.

RONALD GLENN ROBINSON, Plaintiff
v.
JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3; JOHN DOE #4; JANE DOE #1; and JANE DOE #2, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOY CONTI, District Judge

ORDER

On June 16, 2004, this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and ordered the Clerk of Court to file the Complaint in the above-captioned case. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings on May 24, 2004, in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9), filed on July 27, 2005, recommended that the Complaint in this case be dismissed based upon Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. Service was made at SCI-Camp Hill, P.O. Box 200, Camp Hill, PA 17001. The parties were advised they were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections to the report and recommendation. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2005;
  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED.

  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 9) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated July 27, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

20051117

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.