United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
October 26, 2005.
JEFFREY PRATT, Plaintiff,
ROBERT KRAK, et al., Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOY CONTI, District Judge
The Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on
June 29, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with
the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and
72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on
September 29, 2005, recommended that the Motion for Summary
Judgment filed by the Defendants (Doc. 12) be granted. The
parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to
file objections. Service was made on the Plaintiff by First Class
United States Mail and on the Defendants. No objections have been
filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in
the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the
objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2005,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed
by the Defendants (Doc. 12) is granted.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza,
dated September 29, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.