Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

IN RE HOWARTH

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


October 24, 2005.

In Re: LESLIE PAUL HOWARTH cases.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

These matters were referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 5, 2005, recommending that the complaints be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

  The parties (the plaintiff and those defendants who had entered an appearance) were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one has filed objections, and the time to do so has expired.

  After review of the records of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2005, it is
  ORDERED that the complaints in the above-numbered cases are dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark these matters closed.

20051024

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.