Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PLUNKETT v. SMITH

October 21, 2005.

JOSEPH PLUNKETT, Petitioner
v.
JOSEPH V. SMITH, Respondent.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: EDWIN KOSIK, Senior District Judge

MEMORANDUM

Introduction

Joseph Plunkett, an inmate currently confined at the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, initiated this habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Along with his petition he submitted a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. On July 19, 2005, an Order was issued granting Plunkett's motion and directing service of the petition. (Doc. 4.) On September 13, 2005, the court issued an Order directing Respondent to show cause why no response to the petition had been filed. (Doc. 5.) On September 21, 2005, Petitioner filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims due to Respondent's failure to file a timely response to his petition. (Doc. 6.) On September 28, 2005, a response to the court's Show Cause Order was submitted by Respondent along with a response to the habeas corpus petition. (Doc. 7.) Respondent states that a response to the original service order was never submitted because Respondent did not recall either having ever received electronic notification of the action or being personally served with the petition. (Doc. 7, Resp. at 8-10.) Because there is no evidence that Respondent's failure to respond to the petition was premised upon bad faith and because no prejudice resulted to Petitioner as a result of the response being submitted several weeks late, Petitioner's pending motion for summary judgment will be denied.

  In the petition Plunkett challenges the Bureau of Prisons' computation of his sentence, arguing that the BOP improperly pushed back his mandatory release date from October 29, 2003, to December 31, 2006. The petition is ripe for consideration and for the following reasons will be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

  Background

  Pursuant to the record before the court, the following history has been extracted. Plunkett is a District of Columbia inmate presently confined at USP-Lewisburg. On October 23, 1984 he was sentenced by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia to a term of six (6) to eighteen (18) years for Armed Robbery and a second consecutive term of one year for Attempted Burglary. (Doc. 7, Ex. 1, Booth Decl. ¶ 3 and pp. 8-9.) The nineteen (19) year aggregate sentence resulted in a mandatory release date of November 15, 1996, and a full term date of February 12, 2003. (Id., ¶ 4 and p. 10.) Plunkett was thereafter committed to the D.C. Department of Corrections for service of his sentences.

  Plunkett remained in custody on this sentence until February 9, 1990 at which time he was released on parole. (Id., ¶ 5.) (At the time of parole there was a total of 4,751 days remaining to be served on the aggregate 19 year sentence.) However, this parole was subsequently revoked as a result of new criminal conduct on the part of Plunkett.

  On June 11, 1991, Plunkett began service of his first parole violator term. The D.C. Board of Parole granted him 487 days of street time credit.*fn1 Plunkett's sentence was thereafter recalculated to withdraw all street time previously awarded. (Id., Ex. 1, ¶ 6, pp. 14-15.)

  At the time of Plunkett's release on parole on February 9, 1990, his parole violation term consisted of 4,751 days remaining to be served. This parole violation term, which began June 11, 1991, would have expired by full term expiration on June 12, 2004.

  Plunkett remained in service of the 4,751 day parole violation term until September 15, 1992, when he was again released on parole. At the time of this release he had 4,288 days remaining to be served to the full term expiration date of June 12, 2004. (Id. ¶ 6.) However, on September 22, 1994, his parole was again revoked pursuant to a warrant issued by the D.C. Board of Parole on May 16, 1994, for parole violations.

  Plunkett's parole violator term of 4,288 days would have expired full term on June 18, 2006. At the time of revocation, the D.C. Board of Parole also granted re-parole for December 13, 1994. (Id.) From the date of parole, December 13, 1994, to the full term expiration date, June 18, 2006, a total of 4,205 days remained to be served.

  On September 10, 1996, the D.C. Board of Parole issued an arrest warrant after Plunkett again violated parole. He was taken into custody on the warrant on December 3, 1996. (Id. ¶ 7, pp. 12, 16-17.) He was granted 586 days of street time credit on this violation but again, upon his subsequent commitment for his current parole violation, the street time credit was removed and his sentence recalculated to withdraw all street time credit previously awarded.

  On December 3, 1996, Plunkett began service of the 4,205 days that remained to be served as of the date of his parole. (Id. ¶ 8.) The full term expiration date on the 4,205 days would have expired on June 7, 2008. (Id.)

  Plunkett was yet again paroled on January 27, 2000. The days remaining to be served until the full term expiration date of June 7, 2008 was 3,053. This calculation reflected the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.