Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania


October 7, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
ALBERTO DEJESUS RODRIGUEZ.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHRISTOPHER CONNER, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2005, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 43) for reconsideration of the sentence imposed upon the defendant in the above-captioned case, and it appearing that the motion does not aver any manifest errors of law or fact, or present any newly discovered evidence, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence."); Dodge v. Susquehanna Univ., 796 F. Supp. 829, 830 (M.D. Pa. 1992) (cautioning that mere disagreement with the court does not translate into a clear error of law); see also FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(a) (allowing court to correct a sentence "that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error"), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 43) for reconsideration is DENIED.

20051007

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.