Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

WILLIAMS v. HAWK

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


September 30, 2005.

GROVER WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
v.
DON HAWK, C.C.C. Director, Gateway/Braddock, JIM BRENHOLTS, Work Release Counselor Gateway/Braddock, DENNIS RHODES, Director, PA D.O.C. Region 3 Contract Facility, WILLIAM MORSE, PA D.O.C. Contract Facility Coordinator, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOY CONTI, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2005, after the plaintiff, Grover C. Williams, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings was submitted by defendants, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, upon consideration of the objections filed by plaintiff, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Joint Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted as to Defendants Rhodes and Morse as to all claims. It is granted as to Defendants Hawk and Brenholts as to Plaintiff's retaliation claims but denied as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claims against Hawk and Brenholts.

20050930

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.