Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HOWARTH v. FI-HOFF CONCRETE PRODUCTS

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


September 26, 2005.

LESLIE PAUL HOWARTH, Plaintiff
v.
FI-HOFF CONCRETE PRODUCTS, Defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on September 12, 2005, docket no. 12, recommending that the complaint be dismissed for lack of standing.

  The plaintiff was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation or to amend the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed objections or an amended complaint, and the time to do so has expired.

  After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2005, it is

  ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

20050926

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.