Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CINDRICH v. FISHER

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania


September 15, 2005.

RITA J. CINDRICH, Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL FISHER, et al., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHRISTOPHER CONNER, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the motion to seal certain documents in the above-captioned matter, filed by Attorney Don Bailey ("Attorney Bailey"), and of Attorney Bailey's response to plaintiff's motion to proceed pro se (Doc. 52) requesting that the motion to proceed pro se (Doc. 52) be stricken, and it appearing that opposing counsel concurs in Attorney Bailey's motion to seal,*fn1 and that the court previously granted plaintiff's motion to proceed pro se (see Doc. 53), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion to seal is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal Attorney Bailey's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Pro Se, along with the attached Declaration, pending future order of the court. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal plaintiff's motion to proceed pro se (Doc. 52) pending future order of the court. Attorney Bailey's request to strike plaintiff's motion to proceed pro se (Doc. 52) is otherwise DENIED.
20050915

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.