Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HALE v. SCHMELZLEN

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania


September 7, 2005.

TIMOTHY A. HALE, Plaintiff
v.
TROOPER MARK A. SCHMELZLEN; SHEILA LEMLEY, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: ARTHUR SCHWAB, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of Sept., 2005, after the plaintiff, Timothy A. Hale, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the defendants filed motions to dismiss, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and plaintiff having filed objections with a brief in support and defendant Sheila Lemley having filed a response to plaintiff's objections, and upon independent review of the motions and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Lemley and Defendant Schmelzlen are granted;

  IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.

20050907

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.