Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. CRUDUP

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania


May 16, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
CLARENCE LOUIS CRUDUP.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CHRISTOPHER CONNER, District Judge

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the correspondence from defendant (Doc. 29) and addressed to the attention of the court, in which defendant requests an hearing on the lawfulness of his transfer from state to federal custody, and it appearing that defendant is presently represented by counsel (Doc. 16), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The correspondence (Doc. 29) is CONSTRUED as a motion for an hearing and is STRICKEN from the record in the above-captioned case.*fn1 2. Counsel for defendant shall, on or before May 23, 2005, consult with defendant regarding the motion (Doc. 29), defendant's right of self-representation, and the consequences of defendant's invocation of the right of self-representation.*fn2
3. Defendant shall be permitted, on or before May 27, 2005, to file a motion to proceed pro se in the above-captioned case.
4. Defendant hereafter shall refrain from submitting correspondence addressed to the attention of the court but shall, if appropriate, file future requests for relief as formal motions.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.