Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

09/30/97 BOROUGH POTTSTOWN AND POTTSTOWN POLICE

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


September 30, 1997

BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN AND POTTSTOWN POLICE PENSION FUND, RESPONDENTS
v.
PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT BOARD A/K/A PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PETITIONER; CROSS PETITIONER BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN AND POTTSTOWN POLICE PENSION FUND

Petition and Cross Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Commonwealth Court.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 1997 the petition for allowance of appeal is denied and the cross-petition for allowance of appeal is granted limited to the following issues:

I. "Did the Commonwealth Court correctly rule that the "excess interest" policies of the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board are "interpretative rules" that did not have to be promulgated in accordance with the Commonwealth Documents Law?"

II. Assuming, arguendo, the Board's "excess interest" policies are determined to be "interpretative rules," did the Commonwealth Court err in upholding them when these rules are, unwise, violated Legislative intent, constitute an unfair and unreasonable penalty, and work an unjust forfeiture?"

19970930

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.