Appealed From No. 96-40157. Common Pleas Court of the County of Butler. Judge KIESTER, Senior Judge.
Before: Honorable Bernard L. McGINLEY, Judge, Honorable James R. Kelley, Judge, Honorable Samuel L. Rodgers, Senior Judge. Opinion BY Senior Judge Rodgers.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kelley
OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE RODGERS
The South Butler County Educational Support Personnel Association (Association or Union) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County (trial court) that vacated an arbitrator's award and granted the petition of the South Butler County School District (District) for partial review and/or partial vacation or modification of the arbitration award. We affirm.
On May 19, 1995, the District posted a notice of vacancy to fill an elementary library aide position. Among the applicants were two bargaining unit members, Cathy Davis and Penny Forsythe (Grievant), and one non-union applicant, Deborah Rowe. The District offered the job to Cathy Davis who rejected the offer. Although the District found Grievant to be qualified, the District next offered the position to Deborah Rowe, who the District considered to be more qualified than Grievant.
The Association grieved the District's action under the collective bargaining agreement (CBA or agreement) contending that the District was obligated to fill the vacancy with a qualified bargaining unit applicant instead of an outside applicant. The Association also grieved the wages that were attached to the position, arguing that Grievant should continue to receive the same amount of pay as she had received in her prior position. The District denied the grievance believing it had discretion under the CBA to grant or deny a request for transfer.
The dispute proceeded to arbitration and the arbitrator sustained the grievance in part, finding that Grievant was entitled to the position, but he denied the grievance as to the retention of Grievant's current wages. The arbitrator ordered the District to award the position to Grievant and the District appealed to the trial court. The trial court vacated the arbitrator's decision, holding that nothing in the agreement established that it was the intent of the parties that the terms of the agreement apply to non-members of the bargaining unit. The trial court relied in part on Article XVIII of the CBA which provides that the rights reserved to management include the rights of hiring and concluded that the District had not contracted away its right to evaluate applicants and to employ persons that it has rated as best qualified. The trial court found that the arbitrator's interpretation did not draw its essence from the agreement.
The Association now appeals to this Court and raises the following issue: whether the trial court erred in holding that the arbitrator's award fails to draw its essence from the CBA. *fn1
The scope of review of an arbitrator's decision is the essence test under which the arbitrator's decision cannot be overturned if it draws its essence from the CBA. Leechburg Area School District v. Dale, 492 Pa. 515, 424 A.2d 1309 (1981). We are limited to determining whether the arbitrator's decision can, in any rational way, be derived from the collective bargaining agreement viewed in light of its language, its context, and other indicia of the parties' intent. Community College of Beaver County v. Community College of Beaver County, Society of the Faculty, 473 Pa. 576, 375 A.2d 1267 (1977). "Only where there is a manifest disregard of the agreement, totally unsupported by principles of contract construction ... may a reviewing court disturb the award." Teamsters Local Union No. 77 v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 17 Pa. Commw. 238, 331 A.2d 588, 590 (Pa. Commw. 1975) (quoting Ludwig Honold Manufacturing Co. v. Fletcher, 405 F.2d 1123, 1128 (3rd Cir. 1969)).
The arbitrator framed the issue as whether the District violated Article XVI of the CBA when it offered the library aide position to a non-bargaining unit employee rather than a bargaining unit employee on the basis that the non-bargaining unit employee was better qualified. The arbitrator also set forth specific sections of the CBA, including Article XVIII, the management rights section, which reserves to management the right of hiring. Article XVIII states:
The District has the exclusive right to manage, control, and conduct its affairs. The direction of the work force, except as certain terms and conditions of employment are expressly provided for in this Agreement, shall be vested in the Board of School Directors and in the Superintendent. Without in any way limiting the generality of the foregoing, the parties understand that rights reserved to management include the rights of hiring, determining work load, and distribution of work force ; evaluation and discipline of the work force; and the establishment of reasonable rules and regulations governing the work force which are not inconsistent with this Agreement. (Emphasis added.)
(R.R. 44a.) The arbitrator also cited Article XVI A and B, entitled Other Conditions of Employment. ...