Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

STOLTZ v. DATASCOPE CORP. (11/16/89)

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


filed: November 16, 1989.

STOLTZ, ET VIR.
v.
DATASCOPE CORP., ET AL. V. SCHLEIN, ET AL.

Melinson, J., files a Concurring Statement.

Per Curiam

APPEAL QUASHED.

Order

Per Curiam

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 1990, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is vacated and the matter is remanded to that court for disposition of the appeal on the merits.

Application of Pa.R.A.P.311(a)(1), as amended March 31, 1989, effective July 1, 1989, to this case is not "just and practicable," especially in view of the time and money expended by the petitioners in filing, briefing, and arguing their appeal before the effective date of the amended rule, indeed before the amended rule was even published.

19891116

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.