Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SCHOOL DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA AND ERNESTINE J. ROUSE v. THOMAS K. GILHOOL (07/24/89)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: July 24, 1989.

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA AND ERNESTINE J. ROUSE, APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS K. GILHOOL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF EDUCATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, AND PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, APPELLEES

COUNSEL

Joann Hyle and Barbara W. Mather, Philadelphia, for appellants.

Ernest Preate, Atty. Gen. and Michael L. Harvey, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees.

Nix, C.j., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala and Papadakos, JJ. Zappala, J., dissents and would grant the relief requested.

Author: Per Curiam

[ 522 Pa. Page 255]

ORDER

After oral argument and review of the briefs, the Court finds the objections herein raised to Act 110 of 1988, 24 P.S.

[ 522 Pa. Page 256]

ยง 21-2114, to be without merit and therefore appellants' Application for Summary Relief is hereby denied.

19890724

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.