Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. KEVIN MARSHALL WILLIAMS (09/29/88)

decided: September 29, 1988.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, APPELLANT
v.
KEVIN MARSHALL WILLIAMS, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in the case of Kevin Marshall Williams v. Bureau of Driver Licensing, Department of Transportation, No. 2558, October Term 1986.

COUNSEL

Donald H. Poorman, Assistant Counsel, with him, Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Chief Counsel, and John L. Heaton, Chief Counsel, for appellant.

Gerald J. McConeghy, for appellee.

President Judge Crumlish, Jr., Judge Colins, and Senior Judge Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Colins.

Author: Colins

[ 120 Pa. Commw. Page 146]

The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (Department) appeals a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which modified a three-month suspension of Kevin Marshall Williams' (appellee) operating privilege. This penalty was imposed as a result of appellee's failure to maintain financial responsibility (insurance) on his motorcycle at the time of a reportable accident on May 18, 1986, pursuant to Section 1785 of the Vehicle Code (Code), 75 Pa. C.S. ยง 1785. We reverse.

Following a de novo hearing, the trial court limited the three-month suspension of appellee's operating privilege to apply only to his Class 5 motorcycle license but not to his Class 2 driver's license. On appeal, the Department argues that the trial court erred in modifying the original penalty because Section 1785 of the Code mandates suspension of appellee's operating privilege, not merely the loss of his license for the class of vehicle involved in the accident. We agree.

Our scope of review of the trial court's decision is limited to determining whether the court's findings are supported by substantial evidence, whether erroneous conclusions of law have been made, or whether the decision exhibits a manifest abuse of discretion. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Belle, 105 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 468, 524 A.2d 1060 (1987).

Section 1785 of the Code states:

If the department determines that the owner of a motor vehicle involved in an accident requiring notice to the police . . . did not maintain financial responsibility on the motor vehicle at the time of the accident, the department shall suspend the operating privilege of the owner,

[ 120 Pa. Commw. Page 147]

    where applicable, and the department shall revoke the registration of the vehicle.

The Department contends that "operating privilege" refers to the privilege to operate any vehicle in the Commonwealth. Thus, it is improper to refer to an operating privilege as if a separate privilege corresponds to each type of vehicle that may be operated. Accordingly, the Department argues that the suspension of appellee's operating privilege pursuant to Section 1785 suspended his privilege to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.