Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Joseph W. Danks, No. 4914-A-1984.
Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him, Spencer A. Manthorpe, Chief Counsel, and Morey M. Myers, General Counsel, for appellant.
Joseph W. Danks, for himself.
Judges Craig and Palladino, and Senior Judge Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Palladino.
[ 114 Pa. Commw. Page 38]
The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT) appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County (trial court) sustaining the appeal of Joseph W. Danks (Danks) and reinstating his operating privileges. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.
On August 1, 1982, Danks was cited for violating section 3733 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 3733 (fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer). On August 3, 1984, two years and two days after the commission of the offense, Danks was convicted. By letter dated November 11, 1984, DOT suspended Danks' operating privileges for 6 months pursuant to section 1532(b) of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1532(b).*fn1
Danks appealed his suspension of operating privileges to the trial court, arguing that suspension of his license was barred by section 5553(e) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5553(e). The trial court sustained Danks' appeal concluding that the suspension of operating privileges after the appeal period had run on the underlying conviction was "prejudicial to Mr. Danks and illegal under section 5553(e) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5553(e)."*fn2
[ 114 Pa. Commw. Page 39]
On appeal to this court,*fn3 DOT contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying section 5553(e) of the Judicial Code to a license suspension proceeding. We agree.
Section 5553(e) of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C. S. § 5553(e), provides: "No proceedings shall be held or action taken pursuant to a summary offense under Title 75 subsequent to 2 years after the commission of the offense." The trial court applied this section to the license suspension proceeding and concluded that the section was violated because the suspension did not take place within two years of the offense.
The trial court cites the case of Commonwealth v. Jannenga, 335 Pa. Superior Ct. 82, 483 A.2d 963 (1984), in support of its decision applying section 5553(e) to a license suspension proceeding. However, the Jannenga case did not involve a license suspension proceeding, but rather involved a criminal prosecution for violating a provision of the Vehicle Code. In Jannenga, a motorist was convicted of violating a provision of the Vehicle Code, but was not sentenced until 3 years after the offense occurred. The superior court held that the trial court had failed to comply with section 5553(e) of the Judicial Code because all proceedings, including sentencing proceedings, were not completed within 2 years from the commission of the offense.
In Lewis v. Commonwealth, 73 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 607, 458 A.2d 1053 (1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1066 (1984), this court ...