Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. JAMES E. WAGNER (12/03/87)

decided: December 3, 1987.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT
v.
JAMES E. WAGNER, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James E. Wagner, No. 3267, March Term, 1986.

COUNSEL

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him, Christopher J. Clements, Assistant Counsel, Spencer A. Manthorpe, Chief Counsel, for appellant.

Harris J. Resnick, for appellee.

Judges Colins and Palladino, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Senior Judge Kalish.

Author: Kalish

[ 111 Pa. Commw. Page 448]

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals an order of the Court of

[ 111 Pa. Commw. Page 449]

Common Pleas of Philadelphia County which ordered DOT to suspend appellee's, James E. Wagner, motor vehicle operating privileges for a period of thirty days, thereby revoking DOT's fifty-five day suspension of appellee's license. We reverse the trial court.

On December 6, 1985, appellee was notified by DOT that he had accumulated eight points on his driving record and would be notified of a departmental hearing pursuant to section 1538(b) of the Vehicle Code (Code), 75 Pa. C.S. § 1538(b). This was the second time appellee's record showed six or more points. Section 1538(b) of the Code provides that where there is a second accumulation of six points, "[W]henever any person's record has been reduced below six points and for the second time shows as many as six points, the department shall require the person to attend a departmental hearing." The hearing examiner has various options of recommending sanctions to DOT including among others that his license be suspended for no more than fifteen days. Upon completion of the sanction or sanctions, two points shall be removed from the person's record. It thus becomes at once evident that such a hearing is mandatory and that upon completion of the sanction or sanctions, two points must be removed from the person's record.

On December 7, 1985, before being notified of the hearing date, appellee had accumulated an additional three points for a speeding violation. Appellee now had a total of eleven points which made suspension of his driver's license for a period of fifty-five days mandatory pursuant to section 1539 of the Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 1539. Appellee was notified on February 18, 1986 that his operating privilege was suspended for fifty-five days.

The trial court concluded that had appellee been given the hearing as provided for in section 1538(b) of the Code, it would have been possible for him to have

[ 111 Pa. Commw. Page 450]

    received no suspension at all, or at the most only a thirty-day suspension. The trial court therefore ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.