Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. RUTH IRENE VESA (11/18/87)

decided: November 18, 1987.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLANT
v.
RUTH IRENE VESA, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation v. Ruth Irene Vesa, No. 86-1986.

COUNSEL

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him, John L. Heaton, Chief Counsel, for appellant.

John G. Greeno, Berkman, Ruslander, Pohl, Lieber & Engel, for appellee.

Judges MacPhail and Palladino, and Senior Judge Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Palladino.

Author: Palladino

[ 111 Pa. Commw. Page 141]

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety (DOT) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which sustained the appeal of Ruth Irene Vesa (Appellee) and reversed DOT's suspension of her driver's license. We reverse.

On April 27, 1985, Appellee was arrested and charged with reckless driving in violation of Section 3714 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 3714. She was subsequently convicted of this charge and did not appeal. As a result of this conviction, DOT assigned three points against her driving record, thereby giving her a total of thirteen points. On December 23, 1985, DOT notified Appellee that pursuant to Section 1539 of the

[ 111 Pa. Commw. Page 142]

Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C.S. § 1539, her driver's license was being suspended for 65 days.*fn1 Appellee appealed to the trial court.

The trial court reversed DOT's suspension holding that even though DOT had submitted certified records of Appellee's conviction,

     the only evidence to 'prove' reckless driving was the testimony of the police officer that he saw the [Appellee] 'spinning her wheels.' In the absence of other evidence, 'spinning her wheels' is not sufficient to sustain a charge of reckless driving which triggered the suspension in this case.

Department of Transportation v. Vesa (No. SA 86 of 1986, filed April 8, 1986), slip op. at 1. DOT has appealed to this court.

Our scope of review in license suspension appeals is limited to a determination of whether the trial court committed an error of law or violated constitutional rights, or whether the trial court's findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Department of Transportation, Bureau of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.