Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH v. RANDALL H. GREEN (09/29/87)

filed: September 29, 1987.

COMMONWEALTH
v.
RANDALL H. GREEN, APLT.



Author: Per Curiam

APPELLANT'S COUNSEL DIRECTED TO FILE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, A CONCISE SUPPLEMENT TO APLT.'S BRIEF ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY OUR SUPREME COURT IN COMMONWEALTH V. TULADZIECKI.

JURISDICTION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND THIS PANEL IS RETAINED.

CIRILLO, P.J. FILES A DISSENTING STATEMENT.

CIRILLO, P.J., HOFFMAN & HESTER, JJ.

ING BY CIRILLO, P.J.

I respectfully disent. Appellant has failed to set forth in his brief a concise statement of the reasons relied upon for allowance of appeal. See Pa. R.A.P. 2116(b); 2119(f).

Furthermore, appellant has not filed a petition to supplement his brief. Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Tuladzeicki, Pa. , 522 A.2d 17 (1987), I would quash this appeal.

19870929

© 1998 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.