filed: September 29, 1987.
RANDALL H. GREEN, APLT.
Author: Per Curiam
APPELLANT'S COUNSEL DIRECTED TO FILE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, A CONCISE SUPPLEMENT TO APLT.'S BRIEF ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY OUR SUPREME COURT IN COMMONWEALTH V. TULADZIECKI.
JURISDICTION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AND THIS PANEL IS RETAINED.
CIRILLO, P.J. FILES A DISSENTING STATEMENT.
CIRILLO, P.J., HOFFMAN & HESTER, JJ.
ING BY CIRILLO, P.J.
I respectfully disent. Appellant has failed to set forth in his brief a concise statement of the reasons relied upon for allowance of appeal. See Pa. R.A.P. 2116(b); 2119(f).
Furthermore, appellant has not filed a petition to supplement his brief. Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Tuladzeicki, Pa. , 522 A.2d 17 (1987), I would quash this appeal.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.