Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MAX L. WILLIAMSON AND PHYLLIS C. WILLIAMSON v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (05/08/87)

decided: May 8, 1987.

MAX L. WILLIAMSON AND PHYLLIS C. WILLIAMSON, PETITIONERS
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Board of Finance and Revenue in the case of Max L. Williamson and Phyllis C. Williamson, Board Docket No. CPIT 4217-A.

COUNSEL

Stewart R. Snodgrass, with him, Thomas L. Stevenson, Kabala & Geeseman, for petitioners.

Robert P. Coyne, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Judges Barry, Colins (p.) and Palladino, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Barry.

Author: Barry

[ 106 Pa. Commw. Page 53]

This is an appeal by petitioners and taxpayers (taxpayers), Max L. and Phyllis C. Williamson, from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Finance and Revenue (Board) denying their petition for a refund of a portion of their state personal income tax payment. We affirm.

Max L. Williamson is employed as a patent attorney by Alcoa Corporation. He was transferred from St. Louis, Missouri, to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and reimbursed for his expenses including those incurred in the purchase of a new residence: title insurance premium, notary fee, mechanics' lien premium, 1% mortgage service charge, appraisal fee, credit report cost, recording fees, county and state transfer tax, costs for replacement of taxpayers' licenses and motor vehicle registrations, state automobile inspection fee, license plate costs and income taxes paid on moving expense reimbursement. Taxpayers failed to include this reimbursement as income in their joint Pennsylvania personal income tax return for 1979. The Department of Revenue (Department), as a result, levied the appropriate tax with penalty and interest for $114.86. Taxpayers paid the assessed tax and filed for a refund with the Board. On August 24, 1982, the Board, treating the reimbursement of these expenses as compensation, denied the taxpayers' request.*fn1 On appeal, taxpayers argue that Section 7301(d) of the Tax Reform Code of 1971, 72 Pa. C.S. § 7301(d) limits taxable compensation to payments received for services rendered while specifically excluding "payments to reimburse actual expenses" and that the Department's regulations at 61 Pa. Code § 101.6(c)(5)(ii)*fn2

[ 106 Pa. Commw. Page 54]

    also exclude such payments from taxable compensation. The issue then is whether these reimbursed expenses are taxable as compensation under the Tax Reform Code. We believe so and affirm the Board.

[ 106 Pa. Commw. Page 55]

The relevant portion of the Code reads:

(d) 'Compensation' means and shall include salaries, wages, commissions, bonuses and incentive payments whether based on profits or otherwise, fees, tips and similar remuneration received for services rendered, whether directly or through an agent, and whether in cash or in property.

The term 'compensation' shall not mean or include: (i) periodic payments for sickness and disability other than regular wages received during a period of sickness or disability; or (ii) disability, retirement or other payments arising under workmen's compensation acts, occupational disease acts and similar legislation by any government; or (iii) payments commonly recognized as old age or retirement benefits paid to persons retired from service after reaching a specific age or after a stated period of employment; or (iv) payments commonly known as public assistance, or unemployment compensation payments by any governmental agency; ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.