This is an appeal from the decision of the Secretary denying Social Security Disability Benefits. We have reviewed the records and because we conclude that the Secretary's decision is based on substantial evidence of record, we affirm.
Plaintiff is now 50 years old. He is 5' 10 1/2" tall and weighs 300 lbs. His weight has remained fairly constant at 300 lbs. over the past 6 years with the exception of a short-term reduction of 30 lbs. prior to bypass surgery, November 1, 1984.
Plaintiff was employed for 31 years by Halstead Industries (or its predecessor) as a machine operator in a plant which manufactured copper tubing. This job required occasional lifting of 100 lbs. and frequent lifting of 50 lbs. Plaintiff last worked at this job on January 23, 1984 and has not returned because of his impairments.
Plaintiff suffers from heart disease for which he has undergone 2 cardiac catheterizations and a triple bypass, and for which he takes medication. Plaintiff also suffers from diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure. As described above, plaintiff is severely obese.
Following a hearing on January 31, 1985 and the receipt of extensive medical evidence, the ALJ concluded that plaintiff was disabled from his former occupation but that he was capable of performing the full range of sedentary work. Based on these findings and by reference to the infamous grid, the ALJ concluded that plaintiff was not disabled. Plaintiff raises here a number of points in support of reversal which we now consider seriatim.
Plaintiff first contends that the ALJ failed to properly credit the plaintiff's complaints of pain. First of all we recall the well worn principle that credibility is for the officer presiding at the hearing. Secondly, a review of the evidence indicates ample support for his conclusion. Prior to his surgery, plaintiff experienced pain, but still engaged in rollerskating and walks. He testified that after surgery the pain was less severe and that he was able to walk, stand, sit, climb stairs, and drive significant distances without difficulty.
Plaintiff also contends that the Secretary ignored the reports of treating physicians who indicated that plaintiff was totally disabled. However, plaintiff's own testimony revealed that he is able to walk, stand, sit, climb stairs and drive for significant periods. Also, the records indicate that plaintiff's physicians have prescribed increased light activity for him, such as walking and rollerskating, a prescription which has been ignored by plaintiff.
The evidence provides sufficient basis for the Secretary to conclude that plaintiff retains the capacity for sedentary work.
Plaintiff also contends that the ALJ should have categorized him as an illiterate thereby resulting, through use of the grid, in a finding of disability. Plaintiff's own testimony at the hearing on questioning by his attorney reads:
Q. Now you've indicated to Judge Moore that you can't read. You have a total inability to read, or a very limited ability to read?
A. A limited ability. There's some words I can't put together.