Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PAUL WHITESEL v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (J.M. JUNK SAWMILL AND STATE WORKMEN'S INSURANCE FUND) (09/02/86)

decided: September 2, 1986.

PAUL WHITESEL, PETITIONER
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (J.M. JUNK SAWMILL AND STATE WORKMEN'S INSURANCE FUND), RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in the case of Paul Whitesel v. J.M. Junk Sawmill, No. A-89482.

COUNSEL

Lester H. Zimmerman, Jr., Barron & Zimmerman, for petitioner.

Frederick H. Hobbs, with him, Paul J. DuFallo, for respondents.

Judges Craig and Doyle, and Senior Judge Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Doyle.

Author: Doyle

[ 100 Pa. Commw. Page 230]

This is an appeal by Paul Whitesel (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee's decision denying

[ 100 Pa. Commw. Page 231]

    reinstatement of a supplemental agreement for partial disability compensation. The referee found that Claimant was disabled from a compensable injury and had been paid benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. A supplemental agreement, which acknowledged that the injury had changed from one of total to one of partial disability, was entered into between Claimant and J.M. Junk Sawmill (Employer) on March 12, 1974. The supplemental agreement modified the compensation rate to $48.76*fn1 and states that compensation shall continue at that rate from March 7, 1974 for "indefinite weeks." Employer honored this agreement for 500 weeks after which time it stopped paying benefits. Claimant petitioned for reinstatement, the referee denied his petition and the Board affirmed. This appeal ensued.

Claimant on appeal takes the position, as he did below, that the term "indefinite weeks" varied the amount of compensation to be paid or the period of time in which compensation was to be paid, and thus it violated Section 407 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act,*fn2 (Act) 77 P.S. § 731, and rendered the supplemental agreement null and void. Claimant's specific theory is that there is no provision under the Act which provides for the indefinite payment of compensation benefits and hence that the statement that he would be paid indefinitely is "tantamount to varying the period of time during which compensation benefits could be paid to him under the Act." Claimant's brief at 8. (Emphasis deleted.) Employer, on the other hand, contends that pursuant to the language of Section 306(b) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 512, a partial disability terminates

[ 100 Pa. Commw. Page 232]

    by operation of law after 500 weeks and hence that its termination of benefits after that period of time was proper.

Section 512 states that compensation for partial disability "shall be paid during the period of such partial disability . . . but for not more than five hundred weeks." And Section 407, governing compensation agreements, provides in pertinent part:

[A]ny agreement . . . varying the amount to be paid or the period during which compensation shall be payable as provided in this ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.