Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County, in case of Bobbie Sue Burkey, a minor, by her parents and natural guardians, Katherine Burkey and Raymond Burkey, and Katherine Burkey and Raymond Burkey, in their own right v. Borough of Auburn, No. S-1182-1984.
Andrew A. Solomon, with him, Thomas B. Rutter, Rutter, Truner & Stein, for appellants.
William C. Reiley, Zimmerman, Lieberman & Derenzo, for appellee.
Judges Craig and Doyle, and Senior Judge Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Doyle.
[ 100 Pa. Commw. Page 111]
Bobbie Sue Burkey and her parents, Katherine and Raymond Burkey (Appellants), appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County which sustained the preliminary objections of the Borough of Auburn (Borough) and dismissed Appellants' action against the Borough on the basis of the governmental tort immunity provided under Section 8542 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. § 8542.
On September 4, 1984, Appellants filed a complaint against the Borough which alleged the following facts.*fn1 On September 7, 1982, Katherine Burkey was operating her motor vehicle on a Borough street when it stalled, and would not restart. A police officer employed by the Borough directed Appellant to remove her car immediately as it was obstructing traffic. At that time Appellant informed the police officer that she was seven months pregnant and requested assistance in moving the vehicle. The police officer refused assistance and again demanded that she remove her vehicle or face arrest. When Appellant was unable to coast her car off the travelled portion of the highway, she left her car, and attempted to manually push it off the road. As a result of this physical exertion, Appellant went into premature labor, and delivered an infant who was afflicted with severe physical and mental disabilities because of her premature birth. Appellants instituted an action against the Borough, alleging that the negligent conduct of its police officer resulted in the injuries to the infant. The Borough filed preliminary objections to Appellants'
[ 100 Pa. Commw. Page 112]
complaint, alleging that the Borough was immune from liability resulting from the police officer's actions under Section 8541 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. § 8541, which states:
Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, no local agency shall be liable for any damages on account of any injury to a person or property caused by any act of the local agency or an employee thereof or any other person.
The trial court agreed, and sustained the preliminary objections, finding that the allegations of Appellants' complaint did not fall within any of the exceptions to governmental immunity listed under Section 8542(b) of the Judicial Code.
On appeal to this Court Appellants reiterate their claim that the facts alleged fall within the exception to governmental immunity provided under Section 8542(b)(1) of the Judicial Code*fn2 which states in pertinent part:
Acts which may impose liability. -- The following acts by a local agency or any of its employees may result in the ...