Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MARIE MIHALCIK v. CELOTEX CORP. BELL ASBESTOS MINES (06/03/86)

filed: June 3, 1986.

MARIE MIHALCIK, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ANDREW MIHALCIK AND MARIE MIHALCIK ON HER OWN BEHALF, APPELLANT,
v.
CELOTEX CORP. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. FLINTKOTE COMPANY PACOR, INC. AMATEX H.K. PORTER CO., INC. KAY ASBESTOS, FORTY-EIGHT INSULATIONS, INC., EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC. GEORGE A. ROWLEY & CO., EMPIRE ACE CO. HELEN PETACCIO, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARMAND PETACCIO AND HELEN PETACCIO ON HER OWN BEHALF, APPELLANT, V. CELOTEX CORP., BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD., CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE, ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA INC. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. FLINTKOTE COMPANY, PACOR, INC. AMATEX, H.K. PORTER CO., INC. KAY ASBESTOS FORTY-EIGHT INSULATIONS, INC. EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC. GEORGE A. ROWLEY & CO. EMPIRE ACE CO. MARION DORSEY STEWART, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID DORSEY AND MARION D. STEWART ON HER OWN BEHALF, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP., CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP., CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD., CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD., JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. ELOISE SIMPKINS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES SIMPKINS AND ELOISE SIMPKINS ON HER OWN BEHALF, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. BERNICE STEPHENS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CLARK STEPHENS, JR., APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. RONALD MAYKUT, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER MAYKUT, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. CATHERINE WRIGHT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES WRIGHT, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. CONTINENTAL PRODS. CORP. LOUISE BRUNO, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF AUGUSTINE BRUNO, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODS. CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO., LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE MINING CO., LTD. CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE ASBESTOS, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CANADA, INC. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD. CONTINENTAL PRODS. CORP. MARILYN BILLIOPS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT KELLY, APPELLANT, V. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. QUEBEC ASBESTOS CORP. CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. BELL ASBESTOS MINES, LTD. ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. PHILIP CAREY MFG. CO., INC. GLEN ALDEN, INC. RAPID AMERICAN, INC. CELOTEX CORP. NORTH AMERICAN ASB. CORP. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. CAPE ASBESTOS FIBERS LTD. NATIONAL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. CAPE INDUSTRIES LTD. AMOSA (PTY) LTD.



Appeal from the Order entered November 27, 1984 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 81-01570. Appeal from the Order entered November 27, 1984 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 80-20188. Appeal from the Order of January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 80-19443. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 80-19444. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 80-19450. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 81-06213. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 81-07572. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 81-10376. Appeal from the Order entered January 10, 1985 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Civil Division, at No. 80-20569.

COUNSEL

Joseph W. McGuire, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Cavanaugh, Wickersham, and Hoffman, JJ.

Author: Hoffman

[ 354 Pa. Super. Page 168]

These nine consolidated appeals are from the orders of the lower court granting appellees' motions for summary judgment. In each case, an appellant brought a wrongful death and survival action grounded in negligence, strict liability in tort, and breach of warranty against appellees, asbestos companies, for asbestos-related injuries suffered by a decedent.*fn1 Appellees then filed motions for summary judgment alleging that the appellant's causes of action were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. In orders dated November 27, 1984*fn2 and January 1, 1985,*fn3 the lower court granted appellees' motions for summary judgment in each case and dismissed appellants' complaints with prejudice. Appellants contend on appeal that the lower court erred in finding that their complaints were time-barred. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The lower court held that appellants' complaints were untimely filed under the rule announced by our Supreme Court in Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc., 496 Pa. 119, 436 A.2d 181 (1981). In Anthony, the Supreme Court considered and rejected the application of the "discovery rule"*fn4 to the statutes of limitations then in effect for

[ 354 Pa. Super. Page 169]

    wrongful death and survival actions, and held that the limitations periods began to run, at the latest, on the date of the decedent's death.

The statutes of limitation considered in Anthony provided a one-year period from the date of death in which to bring wrongful death actions, 12 P.S. § 1603, and a two-year period "from the time when the injury was done" for bringing survival actions. Id. § 34. Both statutes were repealed by the Judiciary Act Repealer Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, § 2a (310) (wrongful death), (807) (survival), effective June 27, 1978, and have been recodified at 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5524(2).*fn5 In the recodification, both forms of action have a two-year statute of limitations. Id.

In the instant cases, the lower court applied the old statutes of limitations and found that each decedent had died more than two years before the filing of the complaint. See Appendix. For that reason, it held that all of the complaints were time-barred.

Appellants first contend that the lower court erred in applying Anthony retroactively to complaints brought before that decision was filed on October 29, 1981. We disagree.

In Pennsylvania, judicial decisions are normally retroactive, and the construction placed by the court upon a statute becomes part of the act from the very beginning. . . . . A court's interpretation will be applied to cases arising from the time of the enactment of the statute unless vested rights are affected.

Baker v. Casualty and Surety Co., 309 Pa. Superior Ct. 81, 85-86, 454 A.2d 1092, 1094-95 (1982) (citations omitted).

[ 354 Pa. Super. Page 170]

Appellants argue, nevertheless, that a new principle of law was established in Anthony because its result was not "clearly foreshadowed."*fn6 They argue that the decision was contrary to the trend towards extending the application of the discovery rule to statutes of limitations in a variety of situations. We believe that the existence of such a trend is irrelevant where, as in Anthony, the plain language of the statutes clearly precluded the application of the discovery rule. See Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc., supra 496 Pa. at 123, 125, 436 A.2d at 183, 184-85; Gravinese v. Johns-Manville Corp., 324 Pa. Superior Ct. 432, 439, 471 A.2d 1233, 1237 (1984). Having found that Anthony did not establish a new legal principle, and thus failed to meet the threshold requirement of the Chevron test, we hold that the lower court did not err in applying its holding retroactively.*fn7 Cf. Gravinese v. Johns-Manville Corp., supra (applying Anthony retroactively without discussion).

Appellants next contend that the discovery rule should toll the statute of limitations for all wrongful death and tort survival actions filed after June 27, 1978, the effective date of the recodified statute of limitations, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5524(2). Appellants argue that (1) the discovery rule applies to § 5524(2) and (2) that section governs all complaints filed after its effective date. While this Court has held, in accordance with appellants' first argument, that the discovery rule is applicable to § 5524(2), see Pastierik v. Duquesne Light Co., 341 Pa. Superior Ct. 329, 491 A.2d 841 (1985), we cannot agree that the new statute of limitations applies to all wrongful death and tort survival

[ 354 Pa. Super. Page 172]

    actions filed after its effective date. The Judicial Code states: "No cause of action fully barred prior to the effective date of this act shall be revived by reason of the enactment of this act." Judiciary Act of July 9, 1976, P.L. 586, No. 142, § 25(G) (reprinted following 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5524). Thus, in Symbula v. Johns-Manville Corp., 343 Pa. Superior Ct. 541, 495 A.2d 598 (1985), we held that the discovery rule will operate to toll the new statute of limitations for wrongful death and tort survival actions, but only

     where the action is commenced after the effective date of the Judicial Code statute of limitations, and the decedent's date of death was on or after June 26, 1977, with regard to wrongful death actions [where 12 P.S. § 1603 had previously supplied a one-year statute of limitations], and on or after June 26, 1976, with regard to ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.