Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, in case of Frances A. Allison v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia, No. 2967 September Term, 1983.
William Morrow, Karabel & Morrow, for appellant.
Marjorie Stern Jacobs, with her, Joy J. Bernstein, Assistant City Solicitor, for appellee.
Judges Rogers and Palladino, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Palladino.
This is an appeal by Frances A. Allison (Appellant) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which dismissed Appellant's appeal, thereby affirming an order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia (ZBA) which had granted a variance to A. Charles Peruto, Jr. (Peruto) to renovate and expand his garage. We reverse.
On August 24, 1982, Peruto filed an application for a zoning or use registration permit by which he sought to expand an existing garage on his property located at 1830 North 71st Street, Philadelphia (property) which is zoned R-1 Residential. The application was denied because the proposed garage did not meet the area requirements for an R-1 district, which requires a rear yard depth of 30 feet and a side yard depth of 15 feet. The proposed garage would leave a rear yard depth of 10 feet and a side yard depth of 8 feet 6 inches. Peruto reapplied for the same permit on April 18, 1983 and the permit was again denied. On April 21, 1983 Peruto filed an appeal with the ZBA seeking a dimensional variance for his proposed use of the property.
The ZBA held a public hearing on July 5, 1983 at which Peruto appeared and testified that the addition to the garage was necessary because: "I have a couple of
classic cars and I would like to keep them inside of a garage. I cannot keep them inside the garage now because I have too much other stuff in there." Peruto further testified that the addition would rise to the same height as the house and have the same type of roof as the house. Peruto submitted a plan of the proposed garage and some letters from neighbors stating they they did not object to the variance. This is the extent of Peruto's testimony.
Appellant also appeared at the ZBA hearing and testified that her property is adjacent to Peruto's property and that the parties have adjoining driveways. Appellant objected to the grant of the variance because the proposed garage would block air and light to her property.
The ZBA concluded that Peruto had established the criteria necessary under Section 14-1802 of the Philadelphia Zoning Code*fn1 for the granting of the variance and, therefore, ordered that the ...