Appeal from the Order of the State Real Estate Commission in the case of In the matter of Real Estate Broker's License No. RB-017227-A, Real Estate Broker of Record License No. RM-017227-A and Real Estate Salesperson's License RS-020180-A issued to John M. Gobao, Sr. a/k/a John M. Gobcio, dated June 10, 1985.
Loudon L. Campbell, Calkins & Campbell, for petitioner.
Steven Wennberg, Assistant Counsel, with him, Joyce McKeever, Chief Counsel, Professional and Occupational Affairs, and David F. Phifer, Chief Counsel, Department of State, for respondent.
Judges Craig and Palladino, and Senior Judge Kalish, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Senior Judge Kalish. Judge Palladino dissents.
[ 96 Pa. Commw. Page 342]
Petitioner, John M. Gobao, Sr., petitions for review of an order of the State Real Estate Commission (Commission), which suspended his real estate broker's license for a period of one year. We reverse.
Petitioner was a real estate broker. In March, 1983, he pled guilty to one count of knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully possessing cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He was sentenced to prison for a term of three years and served his sentence. Thereafter, he was charged with violating section 604(14) of the Real Estate Licensing Registration
[ 96 Pa. Commw. Page 343]
Act (Act), Act of February 19, 1980, P.L. 15, as amended, 63 P.S. § 455.604(14). At that time, this section provided for a hearing for the suspension or revocation of a license of any person convicted of forgery, embezzlement, obtaining money under false pretenses, bribery, larceny, extortion, conspiracy to defraud, or any similar offense or offenses.
The Commission interpreted "similar offense" broadly. It determined that a similar offense is one which shares the common elements of the seven enumerated offenses in section 604(14) of the Act, 63 P.S. § 455.604(14), namely the securing of money, property, or other advantage by socially repugnant means. The Commission concluded that petitioner's crime shared those elements, because by possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, he sought to obtain money by socially repugnant means.
Our scope of review of the Commission's determination is limited to an affirmance of the adjudication unless there is a violation of constitutional rights, an error of law, or a necessary finding of fact not supported by substantial evidence. Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S. § 704.
Petitioner contends that the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute is not such an offense that authorizes suspension or revocation of a license. He further contends that it cannot be ...