Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. ERNEST WOODS (07/12/85)

decided: July 12, 1985.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLANT,
v.
ERNEST WOODS, APPELLEE



Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Trial Division, Criminal Section, dated April 4, 1984, entered on No. 90 June Session, 1983

COUNSEL

Eric B. Henson, Deputy Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for appellant.

John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals Div., Leonard Sosnov, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Nix, C.j., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala and Papadakos, JJ.

Author: Nix

[ 508 Pa. Page 296]

OPINION

In this case the Commonwealth appeals the trial court's determination that section 9712 of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Act, 42 Pa.C.S. ยง 9712, is unconstitutional. That section requires the imposition of a minimum sentence of five years total confinement if it is established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant was in visible possession of a firearm during the commission of certain felonies.*fn1 In light of our recent decision in Commonwealth v. Wright, 508 Pa. 25, 494 A.2d 354 (1985), we find it unnecessary to discuss at length the issues raised in this appeal.

In Commonwealth v. Wright, supra, we held that the preponderance standard of proof prescribed in section 9712 satisfies the minimum requirements of due process. Accordingly, the lower court's holding that section 9712 is unconstitutional is reversed, the sentence imposed is vacated ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.