Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COUNTY DELAWARE v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (05/22/85)

COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA


decided: May 22, 1985.

COUNTY OF DELAWARE, APPELLANT
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLEE

Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County in the case of County of Delaware v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, No. 82-14996.

COUNSEL

Timothy P. O'Reilly, with him, Jacqueline A. Maykranz, of counsel: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for appellant.

John B. Neurohle, with him, Ellis H. Katz and James L. Crawford, for appellee.

Joseph P. Cronin, Jr., with him, D. Michael Emuryan, Cronin, Emuryan and Breen, for intervenor, Delaware County Prison Employees Independent Union.

Judges Williams, Jr. and Barry and Senior Judge Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Blatt. Judge Williams, Jr. did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Blatt

[ 89 Pa. Commw. Page 403]

The County of Delaware (County) appeals an order of the court of common pleas of that county affirming a Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board order which directed the County to bargain with the Delaware County Prison Employees Independent Union, which had displaced the former incumbent union, Teamster's Local Union 77, as the collective bargaining representative for the County's prison guards.

This appeal raises a question of first impression concerning whether or not a successor union may require a public employer to bargain with it where the public employer had already entered into a collective bargaining agreement with another union which had represented the bargaining unit as a result of interest arbitration to which the successor union had not been a party. Save for the omission here of the County's contention that the Board's order violated Section 7314 of the Uniform Arbitration Act, 42 Pa. C.S. ยง 7314, the issues here presented are the same as were raised below.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the law in this area as well as having considered the parties' arguments, we conclude that the court of common pleas addressed and correctly resolved these issues and we will, therefore, affirm on the basis of the very able opinion of the Honorable Melvin G. Levy, found at 70 Del. Co. Rptr. 441 (1983), D. & C. 3rd , noting, however, that we take no position concerning the Section 7314 issue which was not presented here for our review.

[ 89 Pa. Commw. Page 404]

Order

And Now, this 22nd day of May, 1985, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County in the above-captioned matter is affirmed.

Judge Williams, Jr. did not participate in the decision in this case.

Disposition

Affirmed.

19850522

© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.