Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

TOP OIL COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (03/22/85)

decided: March 22, 1985.

TOP OIL COMPANY, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of James Jones, No. B-215273.

COUNSEL

Edgar P. Herrington, Jr., for petitioner.

Charles D. Donahue, Associate Counsel, with him, Charles G. Hasson, Acting Deputy Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Judges Craig and Palladino, and Senior Judge Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Barbieri. Judge Williams, Jr., did not participate in the decision in this case.

Author: Barbieri

[ 88 Pa. Commw. Page 337]

Top Oil Company (Top Oil) appeals here a decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) concluding that James

[ 88 Pa. Commw. Page 338]

Jones (Claimant) had compelling reason to terminate his employment*fn1 and granting him benefits.

Claimant was last employed by Top Oil as a truck driver until October 21, 1982, when he terminated his employment. The Board found that Claimant had obtained other employment on October 19, 1982, as a body and fender repairman to begin on October 25, 1982, that Claimant quit his job with Top Oil in order to accept that offer of employment, but that when Claimant reported to work on October 25, 1982, he was unable to work because the cars his employer anticipated Claimant would work on did not arrive. The Board reversed the referee and allowed benefits. This appeal followed.

Top Oil presents four issues on appeal. It first argues that Claimant's Petition for Appeal from the referee's determination was untimely filed. In its brief, Top Oil makes confusing reference to the appeal date and the mailing date both of which are indicated as part of the referee's decision as support for its argument. The appeal date indicates the date on which the Claimant filed an appeal from the initial Office of Employment Security determination. The mailing date indicates the date on which the referee's decision was mailed to both parties; they are advised an appeal must be filed within fifteen days of that date or the referee's decision will become final.*fn2 The mailing date of the referee's decision to deny Claimant benefits was January 7, 1983. The last day to file this appeal was January 22, 1983, which was a Saturday. The appeal period was automatically extended to the

[ 88 Pa. Commw. Page 339]

    next business day,*fn3 which was Monday, January 24, 1983. The Claimant filed a timely appeal from the referee's decision on January 24, 1983.

Top Oil next argues that it should have been afforded an opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses before the Board even though the referee gave Top Oil the opportunity to cross-examine and to present evidence. In fact, the referee asked Top Oil's ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.