Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kolody v. Raymark Industries Inc.

March 7, 1985

ANTHONY KOLODY, APPELLANT
v.
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., PACOR, INC., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, J.P. STEVENS & CO., GARLOCK, INC., SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, NICOLET, INC., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO KEASBEY-MATTISON COMPANY, KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, CELOTEX CORPORATION, GAF CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION, OWNES-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNIROYAL, INC.



Appeal From the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 83-4707). John B. Hannum, District Judge.

Author: Weis

Before ADAMS, WEIS, and WISDOM,*fn* Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT ORDER

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

After consideration of all contentions raised by appellant, it is

ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the judgment of the district court entered May 25, 1984 be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Costs taxed against ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.