Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA v. KINGSTON REALTY (11/21/84)

decided: November 21, 1984.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, APPELLANT
v.
KINGSTON REALTY, INC., APPELLEE



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County in case of Kingston Realty, Inc. and The City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, No. 2531 June Term, 1982, PLCB No. 2473, 1981.

COUNSEL

Felix Thau, Assistant Counsel, with him, Gary F. DiVito, Chief Counsel, and J. Leonard Langan, for appellant.

Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Assistant District Attorney, Chief, Prosecution Appeals, with her, Eric B. Henson, Deputy District Attorney, for appellee.

Judges Rogers, Colins and Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Colins.

Author: Colins

[ 86 Pa. Commw. Page 124]

In this appeal, we must determine whether the police power of the Commonwealth, as exercised through the State Police and a lawfully elected District Attorney, may be preeminent to certain regulatory powers of the State Liquor Control Board (Board).

On June 17, 1980, a shell corporation known as Kingston Realty, Inc. (Kingston) was formed at the direction of the Philadelphia County District Attorney's Office and the Pennsylvania State Police as part of a joint undercover operation. The purpose of this operation was to expose, investigate and prosecute organized crime and public corruption in Philadelphia. The scope of the investigation included the Philadelphia police, Board employees and employees of other regulatory agencies who were suspected of permitting illegal activity to occur in restaurants and bars subject to Board supervision.*fn1 It must be noted, however, that the three appointed members of the Board were not suspected of any illegality, either directly or indirectly.

Kingston's sole officer at all times was Charles Kay, Jr., a Pennsylvania State Trooper, who used the alias Charles Kingston during the undercover investigation. In April of 1981, Trooper Kay, using this

[ 86 Pa. Commw. Page 125]

    alias, applied for a Retail Liquor License and Amusement Permit to dispense liquor at 2262 East Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. In keeping with the clandestine nature of the operation, the tavern would receive the romantic appellation, "Casablanca."

The Board approved the transfer of the liquor license*fn2 to Kingston on July 10, 1981, and on August 3, 1981, the restaurant opened for business. Trooper Kay and another State Trooper acted as bartenders and began to accumulate information pertinent to the investigation. On August 21, 1981, the restaurant was forced to close due to exposure of the undercover operation.

The Board notified Kingston of alleged violations of the Liquor Code*fn3 on October 16, 1981. The issuance of a citation putatively followed on November 18, 1981, although it was not reduced to writing until December 17, 1981, or actually served upon Kingston until January 13, 1982.

The citation alleged that Kingston had perpetrated a fraud upon the Board by furnishing false information in applying for the license and its renewal, that Kingston was not eligible to hold a restaurant liquor license since its sole corporate officer-stockholder-manager, Charles Kingston, a/k/a Charles Kay, Jr., held a public office (State Trooper) and that ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.