No. 62 Hsbg., 1981, Appeal from the Order entered January 19, 1981 in the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County at No. Ex. 78-N-529.
George L. Hastings, Tax Division, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., appellant, in propria persona.
Gary E. French, Harrisburg, for participating party.
Wickersham, Rowley and Watkins, JJ.
[ 329 Pa. Super. Page 326]
This is an appeal of the United States of America (The Government) from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County from a proposed Schedule of Distribution of the proceeds of a Sheriff's Sale. The proposed schedule
[ 329 Pa. Super. Page 327]
reflected all lien positions of record in Adams County against Charnita, Inc., a judgment debtor of the Government and Warren A. McFadden, appellee herein. The Government contends that the judgment lien in favor of McFadden had lapsed because no authorized person undertook to revive the lien so that its lien position, second in time to that of McFadden, was therefore first in right. The court below rejected the Government's position and affirmed the Sheriff's proposed Schedule of Distribution. We agree and affirm the order.
McFadden's lien interest was obtained prior to that of the Government on March 30, 1973. Judgment by confession was entered against Charnita and in favor of McFadden and his then partner, Edward J. Halloran. (The whereabouts of Halloran is unknown and he is not a party to this appeal.) The consideration for the judgment was a loan in the amount of $25,000 from the then partners to Charnita. The judgment was entered by H. Thomas Pyle, Equire, a member of the Adams County Bar, who served as local counsel to Charnita at the time of the loan. Because McFadden and Halloran did not have local counsel, the partners agreed that Attorney Pyle would appear of record on their behalf and enter judgment on the note. His fees were paid by Charnita.
The Government's tax liens were not filed of record until September 4, 1973 and August 24, 1974, well after the entry of the McFadden-Halloran judgment. They were filed with full knowledge of the prior lien.
The lien was revived within the statutory period. On January 19, 1978, Attorney Pyle received notice from the Prothonotary that the lien was due to expire on March 30, 1978. The notice was sent to him as the attorney of record. He contacted Attorney James Hopple who was counsel for McFadden and Halloran at the time of the 1973 transaction. Hopple is not licensed to practice in Pennsylvania and suggested that McFadden be contacted by Pyle. When contacted by Pyle, McFadden advised him that he was in personal bankruptcy as of January 19, 1978. Because of
[ 329 Pa. Super. Page 328]
the uncertainty created by the bankruptcy and the urgency of the situation, Pyle decided to revive the judgment on February 7, 1978 without express written or oral authority from any party in ...