decided: May 9, 1984.
GUIDO CENTORAME, PETITIONER
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT
Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in the case of In Re: Claim of Guido Centorame, No. B-213686.
Stephen L. Shields, for petitioner.
Michael D. Alsher, Associate Counsel, with him, Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
Judges Craig, Barry and Palladino, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Craig.
[ 82 Pa. Commw. Page 338]
In this appeal by Guido Centorame from a denial of unemployment compensation benefits by a referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, the sole question is whether he was ineligible because "engaged in self-employment,"*fn1 in that, after separation from his previous employer, all that he did was that he "had business cards made and placed an advertisement in a newspaper . . . holding himself out for home improvement work," according to the referee's uncontested finding.
Noting that a conclusion as to self-employment presents a question of law subject to review by this court, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Minier, 23 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 514, 517, 352 A.2d 577, 579 (1976), we reverse the decision because public advertisement of a pursuit, without more, does not in itself amount to the launching of the new enterprise, but only evidence of an intention to do so. Parmelee, Miller, Welsh & Kratz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 45 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 570,
[ 82 Pa. Commw. Page 339405]
A.2d 1052 (1979). Although Parmelee also involved an ultimate revocation of the intention, in that case, to start a law practice, Parmelee nevertheless stands for the principle that advertisement alone does not constitute doing business, where, as here, there is no performance of work or active solicitation of business, as through bidding. Cf. Logut v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 575, 411 A.2d 881 (1980), where the claimant had been personally active in the solicitation of business.
The decision is reversed, and this case is remanded for the computation of benefits.
Now, May 9, 1984, the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, dated January 17, 1983, No. B-213686, is reversed, and this case is remanded for the computation of benefits.
Reversed and remanded.