Appeal from the Order of the State Civil Service Commission in case of Antonina L. Brengle v. Lancaster County Board of Assistance, Department of Public Welfare, Appeal No. 4194.
Harvey S. Miller, for petitioner.
James S. Marshall, Assistant Counsel, for respondent.
Judges MacPhail, Palladino and Blatt, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Palladino.
[ 81 Pa. Commw. Page 585]
Antonina L. Brengle (Petitioner) appeals from an order of the State Civil Service Commission (Commission), sustaining the action of the Lancaster County Board of Assistance (CBA) in the removal of Petitioner from her position as Language Interpreter, regular status. We affirm.
Petitioner was employed as a Language Interpreter at the CBA from August of 1980 until August 9, 1982. As a Language Interpreter, Petitioner was required to act as a receptionist at the front desk of the CBA. A bilingual receptionist is a necessity because over 25% of the clients at the CBA speak Spanish.
In January of 1982, Petitioner was hospitalized for two weeks, suffering from stress-related anxiety and hypertension. During her hospitalization, Petitioner and her physician met with the CBA to discuss her return to work. The CBA and Petitioner agreed to adjust her work assignment to accommodate her condition, by reducing her receptionist duties to half-time and providing other file duties.
In late May of 1982 Petitioner requested an assignment to full-time file duties because the receptionist work was too stressful. This request was denied by the CBA. In June of 1982, Petitioner refused to report to work at the reception desk, and the CBA offered her three choices: 1) to return to her assignment at the reception desk; 2) to take a medical leave of absence; or 3) to be issued a one day suspension. Petitioner took the one day suspension, and upon returning, again refused to work at the reception desk. Petitioner then received a three day
[ 81 Pa. Commw. Page 586]
suspension, and after a third refusal, a five day suspension. After her fourth refusal on August 9, 1982, the CBA discharged her.
Section 807 of the Civil Service Act*fn1 provides that no regular employe in the classified service shall be removed except for just cause. As our scope of review is limited,*fn2 the only issue before us is whether the Commission's conclusion that Petitioner was discharged for just cause is supported by substantial evidence.
The criteria for determining just cause must be based on merit, that is they must be job-related and in some rational and logical manner touch upon competency and ability. McCain v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Education, East Stroudsburg State College, 71 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 165, 169, 454 A.2d 667, 669 (1983). Twenty-five per cent of Petitioner's work at the reception desk involved her skills as a Language Interpreter. The filing duties did not utilize these skills ...