Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

MORRIS ALBERT v. COMMONWEALTH PENNSYLVANIA (03/14/84)

decided: March 14, 1984.

MORRIS ALBERT, PETITIONER
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA CRIME VICTIM'S COMPENSATION BOARD, RESPONDENT



Appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Crime Victim's Compensation Board in case of Morris Albert, Claim No. 79-0956-B.

COUNSEL

Michael N. Borish, for petitioner.

Sally A. Lied and Francis R. Filipi, Deputy Attorneys General and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.

President Judge Crumlish, Jr., and Judges Williams, Jr., and Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr.

Author: Williams

[ 81 Pa. Commw. Page 77]

Morris Albert (claimant) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Crime Victim's Compensation Board (board) which denied his claim for compensation because it was not timely filed under Section 477 of the Administrative Code of 1929 (Code).*fn1

After being shot in the abdomen by an assailant and incurring approximately $4,000.00 in medical expenses, claimant filed a claim with the board. Following the submission of documentary evidence the board found that (1) the shooting occurred on June 6, 1978, and (2) the claim was filed on June 16, 1980. From these findings the board concluded that the claim was untimely filed under Section 477.4(b) of the Code*fn2 which provides in part:

A claim must be filed not later than one year after the occurrence of the crime upon which the claim is based . . . [ p]rovided, however, [t]hat for good cause the board may extend the time for filing for a period not exceeding two years after such occurrence. (Emphasis added.)

Claimant appealed from the order denying his claim.

Both claimant and the board now assert that the finding of a June 16, 1980 claim filing date is erroneous. Section 191.2(f) of the regulations, 37 Pa. Code § 191.2(f), states that "[a] claim will be deemed to be filed as of the date postmarked, if filed by mail . . . ." The record amply supports the parties' concurrence

[ 81 Pa. Commw. Page 78]

    that the Board received the claim in the mail on June 16, 1980. Unfortunately, the board neither retained the envelope nor recorded the postmark date.

Claimant declares that his claim was mailed and postmarked on June 6, 1980. He further asserts, citing 37 Pa. Code § 191.2(d)(3)(iii), that good cause exists for the board to invoke the two years limitation period.*fn3 Therefore, because the crime occurred on June 6, 1978 and the claim ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.