Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

ALLEGHENY WEST CIVIC COUNCIL v. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY PITTSBURGH ET AL. (01/30/84)

decided: January 30, 1984.

ALLEGHENY WEST CIVIC COUNCIL, INC., APPELLANT
v.
THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH ET AL., APPELLEES



Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in the case of Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. v. City Planning Commission of the City of Pittsburgh v. Community College of Allegheny County, No. SA 433 of 1983.

COUNSEL

Frederick R. Nene, for appellant.

Gretchen G. Donaldson, Associate City Solicitor, with her D. R. Pellegrini, City Solicitor, for appellee.

William P. Bresnahan, with him Denise L. Wilsher, for intervenor, Community College of Allegheny County.

Judges Rogers, MacPhail and Barry, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge MacPhail.

Author: Macphail

[ 80 Pa. Commw. Page 65]

Allegheny West Civic Council, Inc. (Appellant) has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County quashing Appellant's appeal from an action of the Pittsburgh City Planning Commission (Commission). We affirm.

The Community College of Allegheny County (CCAC) filed a conditional use application with the Commission on or about March 23, 1983, seeking permission to use an existing structure at 800 Allegheny Avenue as an administrative office building for CCAC.*fn1 Following public hearings on the application,

[ 80 Pa. Commw. Page 66]

    the Commission unanimously voted to recommend that City Council grant the conditional use. Appellant appealed this recommendation directly to the common pleas court which, having concluded that no final decision was before it, quashed the appeal.

Section 752 of the Local Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S. § 752 provides, inter alia, in part that any person aggrieved "by an adjudication of a local agency" may appeal to the appropriate court of record. An "adjudication" is defined as "[a]ny final order, decree, decision, determination or ruling by an agency affecting personal or property rights". 2 Pa. C.S. § 101. Thus, the Commission's action must constitute a final decision or order if it is to be directly appealable to the common pleas court.

Section 993.01(a)(C) of the Pittsburgh Zoning Ordinance provides the following procedure with regard to conditional use applications:

(3) Action of Commission. The Commission shall make a report of its findings and recommendations within ninety days from the date of filing of the application and shall transmit a ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.