Appeal from the Order of the Pennsylvania Crime Victim's Compensation Board in case of In Re: Claim of Pauline McKnight, Victim: Bruce McKnight, Claim No. 79-0808-D, Death Claim.
Michael N. Borish, for petitioner.
Sally A. Lied, Deputy Attorney General, with her Francis R. Filipi, Deputy Attorney General, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.
President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Williams, Jr. and Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Barbieri.
[ 76 Pa. Commw. Page 275]
Pauline McKnight (Claimant) appeals here from a decision of the Pennsylvania Crime Victim's Compensation Board (Board) denying her claim for out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a result of the death of her husband. We affirm.
On April 30, 1980, Claimant filed a claim with the Board pursuant to Section 477.4 of the Administrative Code of 1929 (Code), Act of April 29, 1929, P.L. 177, as amended, added by Section 2 of the Act of July 9, 1976, P.L. 574, 71 P.S. § 180-7.4, seeking reimbursement for $9,105.05 of medical and funeral expenses she had incurred as a result of the stabbing death of her husband. Following the submission of documentary evidence, the Board denied this claim, and so informed Claimant in a letter dated March 9, 1981. The Board then granted Claimant's request for reconsideration, and the case was assigned to a Board member who subsequently issued a Report and Recommendation on Reconsideration. In this report, the Board member found as a fact that Claimant had become eligible to receive $15,643.60 in social security
[ 76 Pa. Commw. Page 276]
benefits as a result of her husband's death,*fn1 and concluded that Claimant was therefore disqualified from recovering reimbursement by the provisions of Section 477.9(e) of the Code, 71 P.S. § 180-7.9(e), which provides in pertinent part as follows:
Except for claims involving dismemberment . . . any award made pursuant to this act shall be reduced by the amount of any payments received or to be received by the claimant as a result of the injury . . . (ii) under any insurance programs including those mandated by law . . . [or] (iv) from public funds. . . .
The Board apparently subsequently adopted this recommendation, although the only evidence of this contained in the record before us is a letter to Claimant dated January 27, 1982 stating, inter alia, that "[y]ou will note that the Board has denied your claim." Since the parties apparently agree that a Board decision was rendered, however, we will assume for the purposes of this decision that such a decision was reached.
Before this Court, Claimant alleges that Section 477.9(e) only permits the offsetting of social security benefits against claims for loss of support, and does not permit such offsetting against claims for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. We disagree.
"When the words of a statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit." Section ...