Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

APPEAL EMILY S. BELDING FROM BUCKS COUNTY BOARD ASSESSMENT AND REVISION TAXES ETC. EMILY S. BELDING (07/22/83)

decided: July 22, 1983.

IN RE: APPEAL OF EMILY S. BELDING FROM THE BUCKS COUNTY BOARD OF ASSESSMENT AND REVISION OF TAXES ETC. EMILY S. BELDING, APPELLANT


Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County in case of In Re: Appeal of Emily S. Belding from the Bucks County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes, Personal property tax identification Number 8646731; Municipality: County of Bucks, Assessment for the year 1981; Property: Victor L. Belding Residuary Trust, No. 81-10022.

COUNSEL

Robert F. Ruehl, Ruehl & Blackman, for appellant.

Martin J. King, for appellee.

President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges Doyle and Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Barbieri.

Author: Barbieri

[ 75 Pa. Commw. Page 613]

Emily S. Belding (Appellant) appeals here from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County affirming a decision of the Bucks County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes (Board) which denied Appellant's request for a revision of her personal property tax assessment. We affirm.

Section 3 of the State Personal Property Tax Act (Act), Act of June 22, 1935, P.L. 414, as amended, 72 P.S. ยง 3244, provides in pertinent part as follows:

[ 75 Pa. Commw. Page 614]

All personal property of the classes herein-after enumerated, owned, held or possessed by any resident, whether such personal property be owned, held or possessed by such resident in his own right, or as active trustee . . . or by any resident as trustee . . . jointly with one or more trustees . . . domiciled in another state where such personal property is held and managed in this Commonwealth, or in any other capacity, except as executor or administrator of the estate of a nonresident decedent, and except as trustee for a resident or nonresident religious, charitable or educational organization, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private stockholder or individual, for the use, benefit or advantage of any other person, copartnership, unincorporated association, company, joint-stock company or association, limited partnership, bank or corporation, and the equitable interest in any such personal property of the classes hereinafter enumerated, owned, held or possessed by any resident, Page 614} where the legal title to such personal property is vested in a trustee . . . domiciled in another state . . . and where such resident is entitled to receive all or any part of the income therefrom, is hereby made taxable annually. . . . (Emphasis added.)

In 1971, Bucks County assessed a four mill personal property tax against Appellant's equitable interest in the income from a Florida based trust managed by a nonresident trustee, pursuant to Section 3 of the Act, and Appellant subsequently appealed this assessment to the Board alleging that her equitable interest in the income of the trust was not taxable. This appeal was denied, and a further appeal was taken to the court of common pleas which, after a further hearing, affirmed the Board's determination. The present appeal followed.

Before this Court, Appellant once again alleges that Section 3 of the Act does not permit the taxation of an equitable interest in the income from an out-of-state trust. Specifically, Appellant alleges that the word "except" italicized in the portion of Section 3 set forth above specifically exempts such equitable interests from taxation. We disagree.

We believe that it is clear from even a cursory reading of Section 3 of the Act that the word "except" referred to by Appellant simply exempts from taxation, with certain exceptions, any interest trustees of religious, charitable or educational organizations might have in the assets of such organizations, and does not refer to the following clause referring to equitable interests. Our decision in this respect is bolstered by the fact that if we were to accept Appellant's interpretation of the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.