Appeal from the Order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review in case of In Re: Claim of Cora Lee Phillippi, No. B-200062.
A. Martin Herring, for petitioner.
Charles G. Hasson, Assistant Counsel, with him Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent.
Judges Rogers, Williams, Jr. and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr.
Ms. Cora Lee Phillippi, (claimant), appeals from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee's determination that claimant was ineligible for unemployment benefits pursuant to the disqualifying provisions of Section 402.1(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).*fn1
The claimant was employed by the Springfield Township School District (School District) since 1967 as a tenured teacher of English. In June of 1980, the claimant was furloughed from her position as a full time, tenured, professional English teacher because of declining enrollment in the School District. On August 17, 1980 the claimant filed an application for unemployment benefits. The record indicates that she received benefits until she was reemployed by the School District in November of 1980.
On November 14, 1980, Ms. Phillippi was reemployed by the School District as a long term substitute teacher. The claimant worked from November 14, 1980 until June 19, 1981 when her contract as a long term substitute teacher terminated. However, on May 21, 1981 the School District wrote a letter to the claimant informing her that her name would be placed on the master substitute list for the 1981-82 academic year. In that letter, Francis P. Romano, the Assistant Superintendent of The School District, stated, ". . . we would like you to know that you are assured placement
on our master substitute list for the 1981-82 school year." The School District's letter did not require a response; nevertheless, a response was invited if the claimant had any questions about her status for the coming school year.
On July 2, 1981, the Office of Employment Security, (Office), issued a determination finding the claimant ineligible for benefits under Section 402.1(1) of the Law, for the compensable week ending June 27, 1981. The language of Section 402.1(1) states, inter alia, that a person who performs instructional services for an educational institution is ineligible for benefits for any week of unemployment commencing during the period between two successive academic years, if that person performed a service in the first academic year, and there is reasonable assurance that the person will perform service in the second of such academic years. The claimant filed a timely appeal from this determination on July 2, 1981, and the matter was referred to a referee. On July 22, 1981 the referee conducted a hearing which was attended by the claimant and two witnesses for the School District. On July 27, 1981, the referee issued a decision affirming the determination of the Office. On July 29, 1981 the claimant filed an appeal from the referee's determination. The Board, on October 7, 1981, affirmed the referee's decision. The instant appeal to this Court followed.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. However, the central issue to be resolved on this appeal is whether the Board's conclusion that the claimant was ineligible to receive benefits, because she had a "reasonable assurance" of returning to the employ of the School District, was correct as a matter of law.
The claimant contends that the letter which advised her that her name would be placed on the per diem substitute list for the 1981-82 academic year, without further ...