Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Suburban Democrat Club, No. 1594 of 1982.
Louis P. Vitti, Markovitz and Vitti, for appellant.
Felix Thau, Assistant Counsel, with him J. Leonard Langan, Chief Counsel, for appellee.
President Judge Crumlish, Jr. and Judges MacPhail and Barbieri, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by President Judge Crumlish, Jr.
[ 73 Pa. Commw. Page 523]
The Suburban Democrat Club (Club) appeals an Allegheny Common Pleas Court order which denied an application for transfer of a liquor license. We affirm.
The Club, a private social organization, applied to transfer a club liquor license to premises located in a commercial area. Within two hundred feet of the Club there are nine other licensed establishments. Although no one contested the application, the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) denied the transfer solely because of the physical proximity of the other establishments. The common pleas court affirmed, concluding that there had been no abuse of discretion by the PLCB.
Our scope of review is limited to determining whether the common pleas court committed an error of law, abused its discretion or made findings unsupported
[ 73 Pa. Commw. Page 524]
by substantial evidence. In Re: Revocation of Liquor License No. R-2193, 72 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 367, 456 A.2d 709 (1983).
Section 404 of the Liquor Code*fn1 provides, in pertinent part:
[I]n the case of any new license or the transfer of any license to a new location the board may, in its discretion, grant or refuse such new license or transfer . . . if such new license or transfer is applied for a place which is within two hundred feet of any ...