Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

PORT AUTHORITY ALLEGHENY COUNTY v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ELLIS L. ALLEN) (03/21/83)

decided: March 21, 1983.

PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PETITIONER
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ELLIS L. ALLEN), RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in the case of Ellis L. Allen v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, No. A-80746.

COUNSEL

James H. Norris, Ruffin, Hazlett, Snyder, Brown & Stabile, for petitioner.

John N. Rickerman, with him John J. Kirk, for respondent, Ellis L. Allen.

Judges Rogers, Williams, Jr. and Doyle, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Williams, Jr.

Author: Williams, Jr.

[ 73 Pa. Commw. Page 50]

The Port Authority of Allegheny County (employer) has appealed from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) granting Ellis L. Allen (claimant) workmen's compensation benefits as a result of injuries he sustained at work when the hose of a steamgenny exploded.

On June 19, 1980, while employed as a parts cleaner, the claimant was injured when he jumped out of the way of an exploding hose on a steamgenny and fell backwards. He was taken to a hospital for treatment of neck pains and burning sensations on his left forearm and left thigh. The claimant was prescribed a cervical collar to wear for two days and was discharged.

On the following day the claimant was examined by the employer's doctor who found no objective evidence of an injury and felt the claimant could return to work on June 23, 1980, the next working day. After leaving the employer's doctor, the claimant returned to the hospital complaining of the same pains from the day before, and additionally of pains in his abdomen. He was diagnosed as having viral gastroenteritis and was discharged that same day.

Thereafter, the claimant went to his family physician who admitted the claimant into a hospital on June 26, 1980. This physician found the claimant to be suffering from: 1) acute gastroenteritis, gastroenteropathy; 2) spasms of intestines and stomach; 3) muscular spasms of sterocleidomastoid and intrascapular, deltoid, chest and abdominal muscles; and 4) spasms in the lumbrosacral point and muscles of the hips and thighs. The claimant was discharged on July 9, 1980, but came in weekly for an unspecified

[ 73 Pa. Commw. Page 51]

    period for follow-up care. He returned to work on September 2, 1980.

The referee found that the claimant was disabled from June 19, 1980 to September 1, 1980 and awarded benefits for that period. The Board affirmed. The employer appeals contending that the claimant failed to produce unequivocal medical testimony establishing a causal connection between his disability and his work accident, and that the referee improperly awarded several medical expenses.

In a workmen's compensation proceeding, the claimant has the burden of establishing the right to compensation and all the elements necessary to support an award. Fox v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 30 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 93, 373 A.2d 141 (1977). A claimant's right to compensation depends upon the successful establishment that his injury occurred in the course of employment and is related thereto. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. U.S. Steel, 31 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 329, 376 A.2d 271 (1977). Accordingly, a "claimant is entitled to recovery if he or she can establish by competent medical evidence that the disability resulted from the . . . injury. . . ." Halaski v. Hilton Hotel, 487 Pa. 313, 318, 409 A.2d 367, 369 (1979). We conclude that the claimant has met his burden. The referee found that the claimant suffered a work related disability based upon the claimant's own testimony and upon hospital records containing diagnoses made by his treating physician. It matters not that there was conflicting testimony as to the claimant's disability, since issues of credibility, resolutions of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.