decided: March 18, 1983.
ROBERT LOWE, PETITIONER
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, RESPONDENT
Appeal in case of Robert Lowe v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole.
Timothy P. Wile, Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner.
Arthur R. Thomas, Assistant Chief Counsel, with him Robert A Greevy, Chief Counsel, Jay C. Waldman, General Counsel, and LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Attorney General, for respondent.
Judges Rogers, Craig and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three.
Author: Per Curiam
[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 649]
In this appeal from the denial by the Board of Probation and Parole (Board) of the request of Robert Lowe (Petitioner) for administrative review pursuant to 37 Pa. Code § 71.5(h), reference is made to evidence adduced at the full Board violation hearing. Petitioner's brief states that the only direct evidence regarding Petitioner's alleged violations of parole conditions was the statement of Geneva Quarles, the purported victim of Petitioner's actions. Petitioner's brief states that that statement was recanted by Ms. Quarles at the Board's hearing.
The Board's brief avers that an inculpatory statement by the Petitioner, a copy of which is attached to the Board's brief, was read into the record at the hearing by a detective.
Although the Board's certificate to this Court regarding the record indicates that a tape was made of the Board's hearing, neither the tape nor a transcription thereof has been furnished to us.
[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 650]
In view of the conflicting allegations as to the evidence received at the Board's hearing, we will direct the Board, pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 1952(b) to furnish us with a transcription of the hearing to enable us to perform our appellate review.
Per Curiam Order
It is ordered that the Board of Probation and Parole promptly furnish to this Court a transcription of the violation hearing of Robert Lowe conducted August 26, 1982.
© 1998 VersusLaw Inc.