Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

LINDA Y. CLEAVER v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ROBERT E. WILEY/CONTINENTAL FOOD SERVICE) (03/10/83)

decided: March 10, 1983.

LINDA Y. CLEAVER, PETITIONER
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ROBERT E. WILEY/CONTINENTAL FOOD SERVICE), RESPONDENTS



Appeal from the Orders of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board in cases of Linda Y. Cleaver v. Robert E. Wiley/Continental Food Service, Nos. A-78237 and A-81444.

COUNSEL

J. Christian Ness, with him William H. Poole, Jr., Shoemaker & Ness, for petitioner.

Stephen J. Harlen, Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, for respondents.

Judges Rogers, Blatt and MacPhail, sitting as a panel of three. Opinion by Judge Rogers.

Author: Rogers

[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 488]

The claimant in this Workmen's Compensation case has petitioned for review of an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board which reversed a referee's award of counsel fees.

[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 489]

The award of reasonable attorney fees is authorized where liability is contested, "Provided, That cost for attorney fees may be excluded when a reasonable basis for the contest has been established." Section 440 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, Art. IV, as amended, 77 P.S. ยง 996.

The claimant was involved in a motor vehicle accident while engaged in the course of her employment but she continued to work for about a month. The claimant testified that she was afflicted with a stiff neck the day after the work related accident, that she visited a local hospital, and that her problem with her neck and arm persisted and increased with time until she was disabled. However, her employer testified that he was not aware of any claim of injury arising from the auto accident until at least 30 days after, and both the employer and another employee testified that the claimant stated that she thought she had injured her neck diving into a swimming pool. The referee found the petitioner's evidence to be credible but that the employer's evidence was "incredulous" and awarded compensation and attorney fees.

The employer appealed this decision to the Board, which affirmed the referee's finding of compensable disability and remanded to the referee for a determination of work availability and extent of claimant's disability. The Board also reversed the referee's imposition of attorney fees on the ground that there was a reasonable basis for the contest.

On remand, the referee made the required findings on other matters and also reinstated his prior award of attorney fees, referring to the employer's case as a "flimsy fabrication." The employer appealed the reinstatement of attorney fees and the Board again reversed the referee's award. We affirm the Board's order.

[ 72 Pa. Commw. Page 490]

The question of whether a contest has a reasonable basis is one of law based of course on the facts. Truskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 315, 424 A.2d 627 (1981). It is therefore "within the Board's power to reverse the conclusion of the referee on this point, and it is within this Court's scope of review to examine the conclusion reached by the Board." Ball ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.